Talk:Criticism of fractional reserve banking
Appearance
The page needs a remake
Okay. This page needs a serious makeover. With way over 200 kBytes and 500 references it has turned into an unreadable monster. It should be cut in half at least.
Suggestions:
- Clarify what is the purpose of this page - and stick to it.
- Neutrally summarize the subject criticized.
- Sort the critiques into distinctive groups, if possible.
- Cut down on the emotional calls against the phenomenon. Feels good, doesn't help.
- There is a lot of criticism of the most varied government interventions of unknown relevance. Cut it out.
- FRB may be bad, but it doesn't run the world.
Oh and... references:
- It's good to have many of those, but 500?
- Find the best representatives for a given statement.
- Please watch out for using multiple references for a single point. In one place I've noticed 12(!)
I admit I didn't read all of it - it's simply too hard for me, sorry. I overlooked this for a long while and now I can't even figure out what the main criticisms are, which of them are Austrian and where to pick up the arguments. Pestergaines 02:27, 30 September 2011 (MSD)
- The monster is not the article but rather the fractional reserve system itself :-). I agree though. Response and suggestions to be found here. Perhaps clean up slowly over time, when the mood takes you, in between watching riots on Wall Street and in Athens... - Karmaisking 08:13, 9 October 2011 (MSD)