Jump to content

Austrian Economics Wiki talk:Reviewspace

From The Austrian Economics Wiki, the global repository of classical-liberal thought
Revision as of 13:36, 1 December 2012 by Pestergaines (talk | contribs) (What is the purpose of this, in the end?)

It might be useful to have, say, Review:Human Action/1, which could link to subpages for the various reviews of chapter 1, such as Review:Human Action/1/Nathan Larson. Alternatively, there could be categories such as Category:Reviews of Human Action/1 (subpages should be enabled for categoryspace; this will not get in the way of those categoryspace subpages being used as categories just like the basepages). In that category, we could put, say, Essay:Nathan Larson review of Human Action/1. Nathan Larson (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2012 (MSK)

Okay... how do the reviews exactly "represent the views of Mises Wiki"? What are those views anyway?
The very first review posted as an example (I assume) is yet another personal contribution of only one member. As it stands, I am inclined to move it into Essays, where we have ample room for analysis of this kind.
I am also starting to wonder what all these "spaces" are for. If we want to add personal analysis, we can create user subpages. If we want collaboration, we can create Essays, or call for collaboration with others on user pages. If the only point of them is to push personal views, I suggest scrapping the "spaces" and use the existing venues. Pestergaines (talk) 16:36, 1 December 2012 (MSK)