Jump to content

Straw man: Difference between revisions

From The Austrian Economics Wiki, the global repository of classical-liberal thought
Moved editorializing to an Essay page; added links.
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Straw man argument about minimum wage.jpg|thumb|right|A straw argument. Libertarians don't claim that eliminating the minimum wage would improve workers' play. They claim that it would reduce unemployment.]]
A '''straw man''' argument is one that distorts an opponent's arguments in order to weaken them and thereby make it easier to refute them. Straw manning is considered a violation of the conventions of constructive [[argumentation]].{{Fact}}
A '''straw man''' argument is one that distorts an opponent's arguments in order to weaken them and thereby make it easier to refute them. Straw manning is considered a violation of the conventions of constructive [[argumentation]].{{Fact}}



Latest revision as of 00:30, 8 December 2013

A straw argument. Libertarians don't claim that eliminating the minimum wage would improve workers' play. They claim that it would reduce unemployment.

A straw man argument is one that distorts an opponent's arguments in order to weaken them and thereby make it easier to refute them. Straw manning is considered a violation of the conventions of constructive argumentation.[citation needed]

References

Links