Jump to content

Civil disobedience: Difference between revisions

From The Austrian Economics Wiki, the global repository of classical-liberal thought
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
==See also==
*[[Activism]]


[[Category:Concepts]]
[[Category:Concepts]]

Revision as of 00:11, 4 September 2012

Civil disobedience is resistance against the state. The word "civil" refers to the political nature of the lawbreaking, much as "civil society" is the part of the citizenry that is involved in politics and "civil wars" are armed hostilities between those who rebel against and those who remain loyal to a government.

Henry David Thoreau's essay "Civil Disobedience" urged citizens to become that minority that "is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight."[1] Thoreau believed that it is unethical to pay taxes that one knows will finance acts of aggression. There is some debate about this; other libertarians would argue that a person is not morally responsible for what is done with money that is stolen from him. However, the difference is that libertarians have an opportunity to organize against such aggression, since they have plenty of notice beforehand about the tax laws. A person who is surprised by a robber may not have that opportunity.

References

  1. "On the Duty of Resistance to Civil Government". Wikisource. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Aesthetic_Papers/On_the_Duty_of_Resistance_to_Civil_Government. "If the injustice has a spring, or a pulley, or a rope, or a crank, exclusively for itself, then perhaps you may consider whether the remedy will not be worse than the evil; but if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine. What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn." 

See also