Talk:Aggression: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: okay, the Chernobyl accident was no aggression, because it cannot be traced back to the will of a person?! --[[Special:Contributions/84.60.196.18|84.60.196.18]] 13:01, 15 February 2011 (CST) | : okay, the Chernobyl accident was no aggression, because it cannot be traced back to the will of a person?! --[[Special:Contributions/84.60.196.18|84.60.196.18]] 13:01, 15 February 2011 (CST) | ||
You said it right, it was an accident. However, people should've been held liable for the damages. | |||
''Aggression is defined as the initiation of physical force'' | ''Aggression is defined as the initiation of physical force'' | ||
: Then I may copy your credit card and may use it. It's no physical force. --[[Special:Contributions/84.60.196.18|84.60.196.18]] 13:07, 15 February 2011 (CST) | : Then I may copy your credit card and may use it. It's no physical force. --[[Special:Contributions/84.60.196.18|84.60.196.18]] 13:07, 15 February 2011 (CST) | ||
That is theft/fraud. | |||
Revision as of 01:30, 29 January 2013
The word initiation means that the force can be causally traced back to the will of a person.
- okay, the Chernobyl accident was no aggression, because it cannot be traced back to the will of a person?! --84.60.196.18 13:01, 15 February 2011 (CST)
You said it right, it was an accident. However, people should've been held liable for the damages.
Aggression is defined as the initiation of physical force
- Then I may copy your credit card and may use it. It's no physical force. --84.60.196.18 13:07, 15 February 2011 (CST)
That is theft/fraud.