British Currency School: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The currency school was opposed by members of the [[British Banking School]], who argued that currency issue could be naturally restricted by the desire of bank depositors to redeem their notes for gold. | The currency school was opposed by members of the [[British Banking School]], who argued that currency issue could be naturally restricted by the desire of bank depositors to redeem their notes for gold. | ||
==External links== | |||
== External | |||
*[http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/schools/bullion.htm The Bullionist Controversy] at the [http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/ History of Economic Thought] website | *[http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/schools/bullion.htm The Bullionist Controversy] at the [http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/ History of Economic Thought] website | ||
[[Category:History of economic thought]] | [[Category:History of economic thought]] | ||
[[Category:Classical economics]] | [[Category:Classical economics]] | ||
Revision as of 08:42, 4 January 2011
The British Currency School was a group of British economists, active in the 1840s and 1850s, who argued that the excessive issuing of banknotes was a major cause of price inflation, and believed that, in order to restrict circulation, issuers of new banknotes should be required to hold an equivalent value of gold as a reserve. In these beliefs they were supporting the provisions of the 1844 Bank Charter Act, which had been passed by the Conservative government of Robert Peel.
The leading figure of the school was Lord Overstone, the British politician and banker. His role in the debate was analysed and criticised by Henry Meulen.
The currency school was opposed by members of the British Banking School, who argued that currency issue could be naturally restricted by the desire of bank depositors to redeem their notes for gold.
External links
- The Bullionist Controversy at the History of Economic Thought website