Austrian Economics Wiki talk:Commons: Difference between revisions
question on ordering of topics on Commons (or elsewhere, for that matter) |
Forgottenman (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Question about the order of topics== | ==Question about the order of topics== | ||
The wiki software of course, when using the "+" tab (above) creates any new topic at the bottom of the list of previously existing topics. Might it be considered bad form if topics were listed in the reverse order, i.e., newest first? Or, if editor "X" placed his/her topic in the middle or at the top? Am just curious if there is an established etiquette and/or opinions on the matter. (I have no topic pending at this time.) All opinions--pro, con, indifferent--welcome. Thanks! -- [[User:RayBirks|RayBirks]] 21:09, 3 December 2010 (CST) | The wiki software of course, when using the "+" tab (above) creates any new topic at the bottom of the list of previously existing topics. Might it be considered bad form if topics were listed in the reverse order, i.e., newest first? Or, if editor "X" placed his/her topic in the middle or at the top? Am just curious if there is an established etiquette and/or opinions on the matter. (I have no topic pending at this time.) All opinions--pro, con, indifferent--welcome. Thanks! -- [[User:RayBirks|RayBirks]] 21:09, 3 December 2010 (CST) | ||
:I'm not aware of a way for the + button to do anything but add an item to the bottom of the page. That plus the fact that every talk page works the same way (bottom is most recent) makes me think it's not worth the confusion to attempt to change it. Don't worry, one gets used to going to scrolling to the bottom of the page every time. --[[User:Forgottenman|Forgottenman]] ([[User talk:Forgottenman|talk]]) 09:25, 4 December 2010 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 15:25, 4 December 2010
Question about the order of topics
The wiki software of course, when using the "+" tab (above) creates any new topic at the bottom of the list of previously existing topics. Might it be considered bad form if topics were listed in the reverse order, i.e., newest first? Or, if editor "X" placed his/her topic in the middle or at the top? Am just curious if there is an established etiquette and/or opinions on the matter. (I have no topic pending at this time.) All opinions--pro, con, indifferent--welcome. Thanks! -- RayBirks 21:09, 3 December 2010 (CST)
- I'm not aware of a way for the + button to do anything but add an item to the bottom of the page. That plus the fact that every talk page works the same way (bottom is most recent) makes me think it's not worth the confusion to attempt to change it. Don't worry, one gets used to going to scrolling to the bottom of the page every time. --Forgottenman (talk) 09:25, 4 December 2010 (CST)