Jump to content

Occupational licensing: Difference between revisions

From The Austrian Economics Wiki, the global repository of classical-liberal thought
RayBirks (talk | contribs)
various wikify
Added references and expanded links.
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Occupational licensing''' is the process of obtaining permission from a government to practice a profession or trade. According to S. David Young, "today at least a fifth, and perhaps as much as a third, of the work force is directly affected by licensing laws" in the [[United States]].  
{{Stub}}
[http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/OccupationalLicensing.html Library of Economics and Liberty article on occupational licensing]
'''Occupational licensing''' is the process of obtaining permission from a government to practice a profession or trade. According to S. David Young, "today at least a fifth, and perhaps as much as a third, of the work force is directly affected by licensing laws" in the [[United States]]. <ref name="Young_Occupational">S. David Young. [http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/OccupationalLicensing.html "Occupational Licensing"], ''Library of Economics and Liberty''. Referenced 2010-11-29.</ref>


According to Morris Kleiner:
==Effects of occupational licensing==
"Occupational licensing has either no impact or even a negative impact on the quality of services provided to customers by members of the regulated occupation. Additionally, as occupations become licensed, members of regulated occupations see their earnings go up."
According to Morris Kleiner:  
[http://www.instituteforjustice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2057&Itemid=165 A Primer on Occupational Licensing from the Institute for Justice]
"Occupational licensing has either no impact or even a negative impact on the quality of services provided to customers by members of the regulated occupation. Additionally, as occupations become licensed, members of regulated occupations see their earnings go up."<ref name="McGrath_Primer">Lee McGrath. [http://www.instituteforjustice.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2057&Itemid=165 "A Primer on Occupational Licensing With Professor Morris Kleiner"], ''Institute for Justice'', April 2008. Referenced 2010-11-29.</ref>


Occupational licensing was a problem in 1776 when [[Adam Smith]] wrote in ''[[The Wealth of Nations]]'':
Occupational licensing was a problem in 1776 when [[Adam Smith]] wrote in ''[[The Wealth of Nations]]'':  
"The [[property]] which every man has in his own [[labor|labour]], as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of a poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity of his hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper without injury to his neighbour is a plain violation of this most sacred property."
"The [[property]] which every man has in his own [[labor|labour]], as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of a poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity of his hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper without injury to his neighbour is a plain violation of this most sacred property."<ref name="Smith_Wealth">Adam Smith. [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Wealth_of_Nations/Book_I/Chapter_10 "The Wealth of Nations"], Book I, Chapter 10. Referenced 2010-11-29.</ref>
''[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Wealth_of_Nations/Book_I/Chapter_10 The Wealth of Nations]''


According to Wikipedia:
According to Wikipedia:  
"Regulatory capture occurs when a state regulatory agency created to act in the public interest instead acts in favor of the commercial or special interests that dominate in the industry or sector it is charged with regulating."
"[[Regulatory capture]] occurs when a state regulatory agency created to act in the public interest instead acts in favor of the commercial or special interests that dominate in the industry or sector it is charged with regulating."{{Fact|Let's make our own page about Regulatory capture and not quote Wikipedia.}}
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture Wikipedia article on Regulatory Capture]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture Wikipedia article on Regulatory Capture]


[[Mises Institute]] scholar Michael Rozeff states:
[[Mises Institute]] scholar [[Michael Rozeff]] states:  
"In the shorter term, the interest groups use the [[state]] against the public. In the longer term, the state and its bureaucrats rule the roost. In the end, the government bureaucracies expand."
"In the shorter term, the interest groups use the [[state]] against the public. In the longer term, the state and its bureaucrats rule the roost. In the end, the government bureaucracies expand."<ref name="Rozeff_Captures">Michael Rozeff. [http://mises.org/daily/2320 "Who Captures Whom? The Case of Regulation"], ''Mises Daily'', September 28, 2006. Referenced 2010-11-29.</ref>
[http://mises.org/daily/2320 Who Captures Whom? The Case of Regulation]


According to Morris M. Kleiner and Alan B. Krueger:
According to Morris M. Kleiner and Alan B. Krueger:
"During the early 1950s, less than 5 percent of the U.S. work force was covered by licensing laws at the state level. That grew to almost 18 percent by the 1980s—with an even larger number if federal, city and county occupational licensing is included. By 2000, the percent of the workforce in occupations licensed by states was at least 20 percent.
"During the early 1950s, less than 5 percent of the U.S. work force was covered by licensing laws at the state level. That grew to almost 18 percent by the 1980s—with an even larger number if federal, city and county occupational licensing is included. By 2000, the percent of the workforce in occupations licensed by states was at least 20 percent.<ref name="Kleiner_Prevalence">Morris M. Kleiner, Alan B. Krueger. [http://ftp.iza.org/dp3675.pdf "The Prevalence and Effects of Occupational Licensing"] (pdf), August 2008. Referenced 2010-11-29.</ref>
[http://ftp.iza.org/dp3675.pdf The Prevalence and Effects of Occupational Licensing]
 
==References==
{{Reflist}}
 
==External links==
* [[Wikipedia:Occupational licensing|Occupational licensing]] on Wikipedia
* [http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0601.pdf The Economics of Occupational Licensing] (pdf) by Simon Rottenberg, 1962


[[Category:Interventions]]
[[Category:Interventions]]
[[Category:Issues]]
[[Category:Issues]]

Revision as of 14:57, 29 November 2010

Occupational licensing is the process of obtaining permission from a government to practice a profession or trade. According to S. David Young, "today at least a fifth, and perhaps as much as a third, of the work force is directly affected by licensing laws" in the United States. [1]

Effects of occupational licensing

According to Morris Kleiner: "Occupational licensing has either no impact or even a negative impact on the quality of services provided to customers by members of the regulated occupation. Additionally, as occupations become licensed, members of regulated occupations see their earnings go up."[2]

Occupational licensing was a problem in 1776 when Adam Smith wrote in The Wealth of Nations: "The property which every man has in his own labour, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of a poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity of his hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper without injury to his neighbour is a plain violation of this most sacred property."[3]

According to Wikipedia: "Regulatory capture occurs when a state regulatory agency created to act in the public interest instead acts in favor of the commercial or special interests that dominate in the industry or sector it is charged with regulating."[citation needed] Wikipedia article on Regulatory Capture

Mises Institute scholar Michael Rozeff states: "In the shorter term, the interest groups use the state against the public. In the longer term, the state and its bureaucrats rule the roost. In the end, the government bureaucracies expand."[4]

According to Morris M. Kleiner and Alan B. Krueger: "During the early 1950s, less than 5 percent of the U.S. work force was covered by licensing laws at the state level. That grew to almost 18 percent by the 1980s—with an even larger number if federal, city and county occupational licensing is included. By 2000, the percent of the workforce in occupations licensed by states was at least 20 percent.[5]

References

  1. S. David Young. "Occupational Licensing", Library of Economics and Liberty. Referenced 2010-11-29.
  2. Lee McGrath. "A Primer on Occupational Licensing With Professor Morris Kleiner", Institute for Justice, April 2008. Referenced 2010-11-29.
  3. Adam Smith. "The Wealth of Nations", Book I, Chapter 10. Referenced 2010-11-29.
  4. Michael Rozeff. "Who Captures Whom? The Case of Regulation", Mises Daily, September 28, 2006. Referenced 2010-11-29.
  5. Morris M. Kleiner, Alan B. Krueger. "The Prevalence and Effects of Occupational Licensing" (pdf), August 2008. Referenced 2010-11-29.

External links