Book:Achieving Freedom: Difference between revisions
Create page with headings |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== How (Not) To Achieve Freedom == | == How (Not) To Achieve Freedom == | ||
Before we start talking about how to achieve a stateless society, I think that it is important to spend some time talking about how not to achieve a stateless society. | |||
For the past several hundred years – really since the late eighteenth century – intellectuals, priests, philosophers, academics, and activists of every stripe and hue have been striving with all their considerable intellectual and moral might to place theoretical and practical limits upon the power of the state. | |||
The original American experiment was at least intellectually founded upon the ideal of creating a government by and for the people, with the express knowledge that the state was a dangerous servant and a terrible master. | |||
It is hard to think of other examples in history where so many checks and balances were placed upon centralised political power – and it is also impossible to think of a more dangerous and powerful government than the modern American leviathan. | |||
The abysmal failure of such a noble experiment should give all moralists pause. | |||
If the smallest possible government has grown into the largest conceivable government – within a few hundred years – it is hard to imagine what kind of theoretical system could conceivably control state growth in the future. | |||
=== Triple Treat === | === Triple Treat === | ||
Revision as of 11:59, 28 November 2010
Achieving Freedom is a book by Stefan Molyneux. It was preceded by Everyday Anarchy and Practical Anarchy. Only the first part of the book has been released so far.
How (Not) To Achieve Freedom
Before we start talking about how to achieve a stateless society, I think that it is important to spend some time talking about how not to achieve a stateless society.
For the past several hundred years – really since the late eighteenth century – intellectuals, priests, philosophers, academics, and activists of every stripe and hue have been striving with all their considerable intellectual and moral might to place theoretical and practical limits upon the power of the state.
The original American experiment was at least intellectually founded upon the ideal of creating a government by and for the people, with the express knowledge that the state was a dangerous servant and a terrible master.
It is hard to think of other examples in history where so many checks and balances were placed upon centralised political power – and it is also impossible to think of a more dangerous and powerful government than the modern American leviathan.
The abysmal failure of such a noble experiment should give all moralists pause.
If the smallest possible government has grown into the largest conceivable government – within a few hundred years – it is hard to imagine what kind of theoretical system could conceivably control state growth in the future.