Talk:Laissez faire: Difference between revisions
Portuguese (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Forgottenman (talk | contribs) re; prefer not to use copies of WP |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: While in general I'm for creating pages from the scratch, for once the [[Wikipedia:Laissez-faire|Wikipedia page]] seems to be really good about the subject. Guess we could copy this one - any other opinions? [[User:Pestergaines|Pestergaines]] 04:34, 24 November 2010 (CST) | : While in general I'm for creating pages from the scratch, for once the [[Wikipedia:Laissez-faire|Wikipedia page]] seems to be really good about the subject. Guess we could copy this one - any other opinions? [[User:Pestergaines|Pestergaines]] 04:34, 24 November 2010 (CST) | ||
: Several pages could be done that way, and then edited to "correct" usual mainstream "points of view". Is there any problem in using Wikipedia articles as basis? [[User:Portuguese|Portuguese]] 06:22, 24 November 2010 (CST) | : Several pages could be done that way, and then edited to "correct" usual mainstream "points of view". Is there any problem in using Wikipedia articles as basis? [[User:Portuguese|Portuguese]] 06:22, 24 November 2010 (CST) | ||
::All derivative works of WP articles have to be licensed with the CC-BY-SA license, which is more restrictive than the one we'd like to use. Thus we have to leave {{tl|Wikipedia text}} at the top of them. If you do copy from WP, be sure to include a version number in the template (type <code><nowiki>{{Wikipedia text|Article_name_with_underscores|Version #}}</nowiki></code>) so that we can compare the versions in the future to see if our article, thanks to new contributions, is substantially different from WP and we're able to remove the template. --[[User:Forgottenman|Forgottenman]] ([[User talk:Forgottenman|talk]]) 06:59, 24 November 2010 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 12:59, 24 November 2010
should we just copy wikipedias page on this or is laissez faire much different in this context?
- While in general I'm for creating pages from the scratch, for once the Wikipedia page seems to be really good about the subject. Guess we could copy this one - any other opinions? Pestergaines 04:34, 24 November 2010 (CST)
- Several pages could be done that way, and then edited to "correct" usual mainstream "points of view". Is there any problem in using Wikipedia articles as basis? Portuguese 06:22, 24 November 2010 (CST)
- All derivative works of WP articles have to be licensed with the CC-BY-SA license, which is more restrictive than the one we'd like to use. Thus we have to leave {{Wikipedia text}} at the top of them. If you do copy from WP, be sure to include a version number in the template (type
{{Wikipedia text|Article_name_with_underscores|Version #}}) so that we can compare the versions in the future to see if our article, thanks to new contributions, is substantially different from WP and we're able to remove the template. --Forgottenman (talk) 06:59, 24 November 2010 (CST)
- All derivative works of WP articles have to be licensed with the CC-BY-SA license, which is more restrictive than the one we'd like to use. Thus we have to leave {{Wikipedia text}} at the top of them. If you do copy from WP, be sure to include a version number in the template (type