User talk:Karmaisking: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:59, 17 November 2010

Welcome!

Hello, Karmaisking, and welcome to the Mises Wiki! Thanks for signing up – we're glad to have you, and look forward to seeing your contributions.

Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, just let me know. --Forgottenman (talk) 20:02, 16 November 2010 (CST)

Could you please provide the source of what you copied to Libertarianism so that we can document it for copyright purposes? Thanks! --Forgottenman (talk) 20:02, 16 November 2010 (CST)

Hey. It's taken from a very old version (2008) of the Wiki article. The first para is basically me. The rest is a collection of Wiki stuff and me. Hopefully it will evolve quickly to have its own indept presence and the left-wing domination over at Wiki will mean Wiki will evolve the other way. Let's see how it plays out, but I doubt Wiki will have a problem on the copyright issue - certainly not after a few months. Some pictures would be good, but I didn't have the time to import them so will leave that for others to address.

You may not know, but there's been a shocking multi-year fight over at Wiki over Libertarianism, Austrian School, and lots of other artices. Often the best versions are around 2007-2008 before "The Change" - which is a period where the admins took a turn to the left and academics started infecting the running of Wiki and killing off accurate but controversial versions of various topics. If you mined Wiki around 2008 for lots of Austrian topics it's likely you would (1) get excellent material and (2) wouldn't be at major risk of any copyright issues in the sense that they've been deleted and vary substantially from the current versions. Moreover as these versions evolve, they will become more independent and on each iteration the risk of copyright problems gets less and less with the contribution of more original material from us. So it's a marginal issue.

By the way, we need lots of articles that are not necessarily "Austrian" in nature to fill out the contemporary Austrian perspective. Ponzi scheme is one good example. John Law is another. French Revolution is another. Because Austrian arguments for gold build on history, the history needs filling out. I can't do it, but if you have the time, getting a good article on the dynamics of Ponzi and Pyramid schemes would be 90% of the expalanation of the current monetary system worldwide. Karmaisking 21:52, 16 November 2010 (CST)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 :Could you please provide the source of what you copied to [[Libertarianism]] so that we can document it for copyright purposes?  Thanks! --[[User:Forgottenman|Forgottenman]] ([[User talk:Forgottenman|talk]]) 20:02, 16 November 2010 (CST)
-::Hey.  It's taken from a very old version (2008) of the Wiki article.  The first para is basically me.  The rest is a collection of Wiki stuff and me.  Hopefully it will evolve quickly to have its own indept presence and the left-wing domination over at Wiki will mean Wiki will evolve the other way.  Let's see how it plays out, but I doubt Wiki will have a problem on the copyright issue - certainly not after a few months.  Some pictures would be good, but I didn't have the time to import them so will leave that with others to address.
+::Hey.  It's taken from a very old version (2008) of the Wiki article.  The first para is basically me.  The rest is a collection of Wiki stuff and me.  Hopefully it will evolve quickly to have its own indept presence and the left-wing domination over at Wiki will mean Wiki will evolve the other way.  Let's see how it plays out, but I doubt Wiki will have a problem on the copyright issue - certainly not after a few months.  Some pictures would be good, but I didn't have the time to import them so will leave that for others to address.
+::You may not know, but there's been a shocking multi-year fight over at Wiki over Libertarianism, Austrian School, and lots of other artices.  Often the best versions are around 2007-2008 before "The Change" - which is a period where the admins took a turn to the left and academics started infecting the running of Wiki and killing off accurate but controversial versions of various topics.  If you mined Wiki around 2008 for lots of Austrian topics it's likely you would (1) get excellent material and (2) wouldn't be at major risk of any copyright issues in the sense that they've been deleted and vary substantially from the current versions.  Moreover as these versions evolve, they will become more independent and on each iteration the risk of copyright problems gets less and less with the contribution of more original material from us.  So it's a marginal issue.
 ::By the way, we need lots of articles that are not necessarily "Austrian" in nature to fill out the contemporary Austrian perspective.  Ponzi scheme is one good example.  John Law is another.  French Revolution is another.  Because Austrian arguments for gold build on history, the history needs filling out.  I can't do it, but if you have the time, getting a good article on the dynamics of Ponzi and Pyramid schemes would be 90% of the expalanation of the current monetary system worldwide. [[User:Karmaisking|Karmaisking]] 21:52, 16 November 2010 (CST)