Argumentation talk:Fractional Reserve Banking: Difference between revisions
Pestergaines (talk | contribs) About the page. |
John James (talk | contribs) →Purpose?: response |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Karmaisking, can you explain the purpose of this page in light of all the work you've done on [[Criticism of fractional reserve banking]]? --[[User:John James|John James]] 19:56, 29 June 2011 (MSD) | Karmaisking, can you explain the purpose of this page in light of all the work you've done on [[Criticism of fractional reserve banking]]? --[[User:John James|John James]] 19:56, 29 June 2011 (MSD) | ||
:Not sure if you've seen [[Argumentation:ABCT]]; I think the idea is to build out arguments for and against on separate pages. Not sure I agree, but I don't see any harm either. --[[User:Forgottenman|Forgottenman]] ([[User talk:Forgottenman|talk]]) 20:17, 29 June 2011 (MSD) | :Not sure if you've seen [[Argumentation:ABCT]]; I think the idea is to build out arguments for and against on separate pages. Not sure I agree, but I don't see any harm either. --[[User:Forgottenman|Forgottenman]] ([[User talk:Forgottenman|talk]]) 20:17, 29 June 2011 (MSD) | ||
::Perhaps the page should be a little more simplified, but that can be worked on. The purpose of these pages is to offer easily accessible stock arguments. These pages are a little experiment some folks have called for for a long time - and I think there's a chance it'll work. Let's see what comes of it. [[User:Pestergaines|Pestergaines]] 23:10, 29 June 2011 (MSD) | ::Perhaps the page should be a little more simplified, but that can be worked on. The purpose of these pages is to offer easily accessible stock arguments. These pages are a little experiment some folks have called for for a long time - and I think there's a chance it'll work. Let's see what comes of it. [[User:Pestergaines|Pestergaines]] 23:10, 29 June 2011 (MSD) | ||
My point was I don't really see the difference between the two pages. It looks like this one is just an undeveloped summary of [[Criticism of fractional reserve banking]] page. The majority of this page is a section called "Criticisms". --[[User:John James|John James]] 01:09, 30 June 2011 (MSD) | |||
Revision as of 21:09, 29 June 2011
Purpose?
Karmaisking, can you explain the purpose of this page in light of all the work you've done on Criticism of fractional reserve banking? --John James 19:56, 29 June 2011 (MSD)
- Not sure if you've seen Argumentation:ABCT; I think the idea is to build out arguments for and against on separate pages. Not sure I agree, but I don't see any harm either. --Forgottenman (talk) 20:17, 29 June 2011 (MSD)
- Perhaps the page should be a little more simplified, but that can be worked on. The purpose of these pages is to offer easily accessible stock arguments. These pages are a little experiment some folks have called for for a long time - and I think there's a chance it'll work. Let's see what comes of it. Pestergaines 23:10, 29 June 2011 (MSD)
My point was I don't really see the difference between the two pages. It looks like this one is just an undeveloped summary of Criticism of fractional reserve banking page. The majority of this page is a section called "Criticisms". --John James 01:09, 30 June 2011 (MSD)