Jump to content

User talk:Eozhik: Difference between revisions

From The Austrian Economics Wiki, the global repository of classical-liberal thought
No edit summary
Eozhik (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
:: Nathan, nobody have much of understanding of dialectics, because this is a kind of sophisticated charlatanianism (see for example, Popper's paper: http://www.vordenker.de/ggphilosophy/popper_what-is-dialectic.pdf). However, at Soviet time marxists used it as a main instrument for forcing out logic, which they called "old-fashioned logic". I expected that there were investigations on this topic, but I can't find them. :( [[User:Eozhik|Eozhik]] ([[User talk:Eozhik|talk]]) 13:58, 31 October 2013 (MSK)
:: Nathan, nobody have much of understanding of dialectics, because this is a kind of sophisticated charlatanianism (see for example, Popper's paper: http://www.vordenker.de/ggphilosophy/popper_what-is-dialectic.pdf). However, at Soviet time marxists used it as a main instrument for forcing out logic, which they called "old-fashioned logic". I expected that there were investigations on this topic, but I can't find them. :( [[User:Eozhik|Eozhik]] ([[User talk:Eozhik|talk]]) 13:58, 31 October 2013 (MSK)
:::I see some stuff about dialectics [http://mises.org/books/socialism/preface_second_german_edition.aspx here], [http://mises.org/th/chapter7.asp here], etc. Did you do a keyword search of mises.org? Mises did address the topic. But I never spent much time studying it, partly because people hardly ever bring the topic up in debate. [[User:Nathan Larson|Nathan Larson]] ([[User talk:Nathan Larson|talk]]) 18:54, 31 October 2013 (MSK)
:::I see some stuff about dialectics [http://mises.org/books/socialism/preface_second_german_edition.aspx here], [http://mises.org/th/chapter7.asp here], etc. Did you do a keyword search of mises.org? Mises did address the topic. But I never spent much time studying it, partly because people hardly ever bring the topic up in debate. [[User:Nathan Larson|Nathan Larson]] ([[User talk:Nathan Larson|talk]]) 18:54, 31 October 2013 (MSK)
:::: Nathan, thank you very much! No, I didn't try to find this at mises.org, I don't know why. I am reading this, thank you again! [[User:Eozhik|Eozhik]] ([[User talk:Eozhik|talk]]) 09:56, 1 November 2013 (MSK)

Revision as of 05:56, 1 November 2013

Welcome!

Hello, Eozhik, and welcome to the Mises Wiki! Thanks for signing up – we're glad to have you! If you need help getting started, take a look at our help pages.

Community discussion takes place at the MisesWiki Commons, so feel free to post any questions you might have there or on my talk page. Please sign your messages on talk and discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, welcome! Nathan Larson (talk) 10:55, 31 October 2013 (MSK)

Yeah, I never had much of an understanding of dialectics, and unfortunately I don't speak Russian. Nathan Larson (talk) 13:47, 31 October 2013 (MSK)
Nathan, nobody have much of understanding of dialectics, because this is a kind of sophisticated charlatanianism (see for example, Popper's paper: http://www.vordenker.de/ggphilosophy/popper_what-is-dialectic.pdf). However, at Soviet time marxists used it as a main instrument for forcing out logic, which they called "old-fashioned logic". I expected that there were investigations on this topic, but I can't find them. :( Eozhik (talk) 13:58, 31 October 2013 (MSK)
I see some stuff about dialectics here, here, etc. Did you do a keyword search of mises.org? Mises did address the topic. But I never spent much time studying it, partly because people hardly ever bring the topic up in debate. Nathan Larson (talk) 18:54, 31 October 2013 (MSK)
Nathan, thank you very much! No, I didn't try to find this at mises.org, I don't know why. I am reading this, thank you again! Eozhik (talk) 09:56, 1 November 2013 (MSK)