Jump to content

No Treason: Difference between revisions

From The Austrian Economics Wiki, the global repository of classical-liberal thought
create
 
RayBirks (talk | contribs)
wikify
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''No Treason''''' is a three-part essay by [[Lysander Spooner]], published in pamphlet format in 1867 and 1870. In it, Spooner argues that the United States Constitution, as a legal contract, is invalid because individuals did not consent to it. In the context of the [[American Civil War]], Spooner therefore supports the secession of the South, even though he was fiercely anti-slavery. Similarly, he argues that the secessionists did not commit treason, since they never signed the Constitution and therefore are not bound to it.
'''''No Treason''''' is a three-part essay by [[Lysander Spooner]], published in pamphlet format in 1867 and 1870. In it, Spooner argues that the [[Constitution of the United States|United States Constitution]], as a legal [[contract]], is invalid because individuals did not consent to it. In the context of the [[American Civil War]], Spooner therefore supports the [[Secession|secession]] of the South, even though he was fiercely anti-[[slavery]]. Similarly, he argues that the secessionists did not commit treason, since they never signed the Constitution and therefore are not bound to it.


The first two parts were published in 1867, and the third, called "No. 6," was published in 1870.  Numbers 3, 4, and 5 never appeared.
The first two parts were published in 1867, and the third, called "No. 6," was published in 1870.  Numbers 3, 4, and 5 never appeared.


Murray Rothbard called it "the greatest case for anarchist political philosophy ever written."
[[Murray N. Rothbard|Murray Rothbard]] called it "the greatest case for [[Anarchism|anarchist political philosophy]] ever written."


==Links==
==Links==

Revision as of 06:20, 27 January 2011

No Treason is a three-part essay by Lysander Spooner, published in pamphlet format in 1867 and 1870. In it, Spooner argues that the United States Constitution, as a legal contract, is invalid because individuals did not consent to it. In the context of the American Civil War, Spooner therefore supports the secession of the South, even though he was fiercely anti-slavery. Similarly, he argues that the secessionists did not commit treason, since they never signed the Constitution and therefore are not bound to it.

The first two parts were published in 1867, and the third, called "No. 6," was published in 1870. Numbers 3, 4, and 5 never appeared.

Murray Rothbard called it "the greatest case for anarchist political philosophy ever written."

Links