Jump to content

Talk:Aggression: Difference between revisions

From The Austrian Economics Wiki, the global repository of classical-liberal thought
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


: okay, the Chernobyl accident was no aggression, because it cannot be traced back to the will of a person?! --[[Special:Contributions/84.60.196.18|84.60.196.18]] 13:01, 15 February 2011 (CST)
: okay, the Chernobyl accident was no aggression, because it cannot be traced back to the will of a person?! --[[Special:Contributions/84.60.196.18|84.60.196.18]] 13:01, 15 February 2011 (CST)
You said it right, it was an accident. However, people should've been held liable for the damages. -Mr. Bom


''Aggression is defined as the initiation of physical force''
''Aggression is defined as the initiation of physical force''


: Then I may copy your credit card and may use it. It's no physical force. --[[Special:Contributions/84.60.196.18|84.60.196.18]] 13:07, 15 February 2011 (CST)
: Then I may copy your credit card and may use it. It's no physical force. --[[Special:Contributions/84.60.196.18|84.60.196.18]] 13:07, 15 February 2011 (CST)
That would be theft/fraud. -Mr. Bom

Latest revision as of 01:31, 29 January 2013

The word initiation means that the force can be causally traced back to the will of a person.

okay, the Chernobyl accident was no aggression, because it cannot be traced back to the will of a person?! --84.60.196.18 13:01, 15 February 2011 (CST)

You said it right, it was an accident. However, people should've been held liable for the damages. -Mr. Bom

Aggression is defined as the initiation of physical force

Then I may copy your credit card and may use it. It's no physical force. --84.60.196.18 13:07, 15 February 2011 (CST)

That would be theft/fraud. -Mr. Bom