Trade - Revision history

ArchiveBot: Repoint 2 dead mises.org links to the archived original (automated; see Austrian Economics Wiki:Link repointing)

2026-08-16T04:23:19Z

Repoint 2 dead mises.org links to the archived original (automated; see Austrian Economics Wiki:Link repointing)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:23, 16 August 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==Trade and Production==		==Trade and Production==
	The fundamental law of production is that joint production yields a greater return than isolated production. Two individuals working in isolation from one another produce less physical goods and services than if they coordinated their efforts. This is probably the most momentous fact of social life. [[Wikipedia:David Ricardo\|David Ricardo]] first formulated this law as a law of [[Wikipedia:Comparative advantage\|comparative cost]] within the context of the theory of foreign trade. Later economists such as Pareto, Edgeworth, Seligman, and Mises argued that it was in fact a general law of exchange. Mises coined the expression “law of association.” Even if there were no other reasons for human beings to cooperate, the greater productivity of joint efforts, compared to isolated production, tends to draw them together.<ref name="Hulsmann_production">Jörg Guido Hülsmann. [~~http~~://~~www.mises~~.org/books/~~moneyproduction.pdf~~ "The Ethics of Money Production"], 1. The Division of Labor without Money, p.21, referenced 2009-05-08</ref>		The fundamental law of production is that joint production yields a greater return than isolated production. Two individuals working in isolation from one another produce less physical goods and services than if they coordinated their efforts. This is probably the most momentous fact of social life. [[Wikipedia:David Ricardo\|David Ricardo]] first formulated this law as a law of [[Wikipedia:Comparative advantage\|comparative cost]] within the context of the theory of foreign trade. Later economists such as Pareto, Edgeworth, Seligman, and Mises argued that it was in fact a general law of exchange. Mises coined the expression “law of association.” Even if there were no other reasons for human beings to cooperate, the greater productivity of joint efforts, compared to isolated production, tends to draw them together.<ref name="Hulsmann_production">Jörg Guido Hülsmann. [https://freecapitalists.org/books/the-ethics-of-money-production/ "The Ethics of Money Production"], 1. The Division of Labor without Money, p.21, referenced 2009-05-08</ref>
	{{See also\|Production}}		{{See also\|Production}}

Line 23:		Line 23:
	Direct exchange is also called '''barter'''.		Direct exchange is also called '''barter'''.

	Jones can trade his apple against two eggs from Brown. In such a world, the volume of exchanges—in other words, the extent of social cooperation—is limited through technological constraints and through the problem of the double coincidence of wants. Barter exchanges take place only if each trading partner has a direct personal need for the good he receives in the exchange. But even in those cases in which the double coincidence of wants is given, the goods are often too bulky and cannot be subdivided to accommodate them to the needs. Imagine a carpenter trying to buy ten pounds of flour with a chair. The chair is far more valuable than the flour, so how can an exchange be arranged? Cutting the chair into, say, twenty pieces would not provide him with objects that are worth just one twentieth of the value of a chair; rather such a "division" of the chair would destroy its entire value. The exchange would therefore not take place.<ref name="Hulsmann_barter">Jörg Guido Hülsmann. [~~http~~://~~www.mises~~.org/books/~~moneyproduction.pdf~~ "The Ethics of Money Production"], 1. The Division of Labor without Money, p.22, referenced 2009-05-08</ref>		Jones can trade his apple against two eggs from Brown. In such a world, the volume of exchanges—in other words, the extent of social cooperation—is limited through technological constraints and through the problem of the double coincidence of wants. Barter exchanges take place only if each trading partner has a direct personal need for the good he receives in the exchange. But even in those cases in which the double coincidence of wants is given, the goods are often too bulky and cannot be subdivided to accommodate them to the needs. Imagine a carpenter trying to buy ten pounds of flour with a chair. The chair is far more valuable than the flour, so how can an exchange be arranged? Cutting the chair into, say, twenty pieces would not provide him with objects that are worth just one twentieth of the value of a chair; rather such a "division" of the chair would destroy its entire value. The exchange would therefore not take place.<ref name="Hulsmann_barter">Jörg Guido Hülsmann. [https://freecapitalists.org/books/the-ethics-of-money-production/ "The Ethics of Money Production"], 1. The Division of Labor without Money, p.22, referenced 2009-05-08</ref>

	==Indirect Exchange==		==Indirect Exchange==

ArchiveBot: Repoint 6 dead mises.org links to the archived original (automated; see Austrian Economics Wiki:Link repointing)

2026-08-16T04:10:03Z

Repoint 6 dead mises.org links to the archived original (automated; see Austrian Economics Wiki:Link repointing)

Pesterbot: /* Links */External Links to Links, replaced: ==External links== → ==Links==

2011-06-21T19:24:35Z

Links: External Links to Links, replaced: ==External links== → ==Links==

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 21 June 2011
Line 48:		Line 48:
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}

	==~~External links~~==		==Links==
	* [[Wikipedia:Trade\|Trade]] on Wikipedia		* [[Wikipedia:Trade\|Trade]] on Wikipedia
	* Jeffrey Tucker, [http://mises.org/story/3834 Halloween and its Candy Economy], article on exchange and formation of money		* Jeffrey Tucker, [http://mises.org/story/3834 Halloween and its Candy Economy], article on exchange and formation of money

Forgottenman: /* External links */Category:Economical Concepts --> Category:Economic concepts using AWB

2010-11-09T18:02:53Z

External links: Category:Economical Concepts --> Category:Economic concepts using AWB

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:02, 9 November 2010
Line 55:		Line 55:
	* [http://mises.org/daily/1469 Ten Ethical Objections to the Market Economy] by Murray N. Rothbard, excerpted from [[Man, Economy, and State]]		* [http://mises.org/daily/1469 Ten Ethical Objections to the Market Economy] by Murray N. Rothbard, excerpted from [[Man, Economy, and State]]
	* [http://mises.org/daily/4635 The Law of Association] by Abhinandan Mallick, September 2010		* [http://mises.org/daily/4635 The Law of Association] by Abhinandan Mallick, September 2010
	[[Category:~~Economical Concepts~~]]		[[Category:Economic concepts]]

Pestergaines: 22 revisions: Importing pages from Autrian Economics Wiki.

2010-11-06T12:42:54Z

22 revisions: Importing pages from Autrian Economics Wiki.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:42, 6 November 2010
(No difference)

Pestergaines: /* External links */ Resource added.

2010-09-08T22:57:12Z

External links: Resource added.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 8 September 2010
Line 54:		Line 54:
	* [http://mises.org/daily/3134 Trade Makes People Better Off, Even Superheroes] by Art Carden and Mike Hammock, October 2008		* [http://mises.org/daily/3134 Trade Makes People Better Off, Even Superheroes] by Art Carden and Mike Hammock, October 2008
	* [http://mises.org/daily/1469 Ten Ethical Objections to the Market Economy] by Murray N. Rothbard, excerpted from [[Man, Economy, and State]]		* [http://mises.org/daily/1469 Ten Ethical Objections to the Market Economy] by Murray N. Rothbard, excerpted from [[Man, Economy, and State]]
			* [http://mises.org/daily/4635 The Law of Association] by Abhinandan Mallick, September 2010
	[[Category:Economical Concepts]]		[[Category:Economical Concepts]]

0.0.0.0 at 21:24, 13 August 2010

2010-08-13T21:24:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 13 August 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Stub}}		{{RightTOC}}{{Stub}}

	'''Trade''' is the voluntary interpersonal exchange of [[good]]s.		'''Trade''' is the voluntary interpersonal exchange of [[good]]s.

88.66.196.150: Resource added.

2010-08-05T20:32:38Z

Resource added.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 5 August 2010
Line 53:		Line 53:
	* [http://blog.mises.org/archives/011356.asp The Story of Trade and Money] by Walter Block (video mashup of a lecture)		* [http://blog.mises.org/archives/011356.asp The Story of Trade and Money] by Walter Block (video mashup of a lecture)
	* [http://mises.org/daily/3134 Trade Makes People Better Off, Even Superheroes] by Art Carden and Mike Hammock, October 2008		* [http://mises.org/daily/3134 Trade Makes People Better Off, Even Superheroes] by Art Carden and Mike Hammock, October 2008
			* [http://mises.org/daily/1469 Ten Ethical Objections to the Market Economy] by Murray N. Rothbard, excerpted from [[Man, Economy, and State]]
	[[Category:Economical Concepts]]		[[Category:Economical Concepts]]

Pestergaines: Resource added.

2010-05-27T20:43:59Z

Resource added.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 27 May 2010
Line 52:		Line 52:
	* Jeffrey Tucker, [http://mises.org/story/3834 Halloween and its Candy Economy], article on exchange and formation of money		* Jeffrey Tucker, [http://mises.org/story/3834 Halloween and its Candy Economy], article on exchange and formation of money
	* [http://blog.mises.org/archives/011356.asp The Story of Trade and Money] by Walter Block (video mashup of a lecture)		* [http://blog.mises.org/archives/011356.asp The Story of Trade and Money] by Walter Block (video mashup of a lecture)
			* [http://mises.org/daily/3134 Trade Makes People Better Off, Even Superheroes] by Art Carden and Mike Hammock, October 2008
	[[Category:Economical Concepts]]		[[Category:Economical Concepts]]

Pestergaines: Realigned links.

2010-05-27T20:36:21Z

Realigned links.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 27 May 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==Trade and Production==		==Trade and Production==
	The fundamental law of production is that joint production yields a greater return than isolated production. Two individuals working in isolation from one another produce less physical goods and services than if they coordinated their efforts. This is probably the most momentous fact of social life. [[Wikipedia:David Ricardo\|David Ricardo]] first formulated this law as a law of ~~comparative~~ [[cost]] within the context of the theory of foreign trade. Later economists such as Pareto, Edgeworth, Seligman, and Mises argued that it was in fact a general law of exchange. Mises coined the expression “law of association.” Even if there were no other reasons for human beings to cooperate, the greater productivity of joint efforts, compared to isolated production, tends to draw them together.<ref name="Hulsmann_production">Jörg Guido Hülsmann. [http://www.mises.org/books/moneyproduction.pdf "The Ethics of Money Production"], 1. The Division of Labor without Money, p.21, referenced 2009-05-08</ref>		The fundamental law of production is that joint production yields a greater return than isolated production. Two individuals working in isolation from one another produce less physical goods and services than if they coordinated their efforts. This is probably the most momentous fact of social life. [[Wikipedia:David Ricardo\|David Ricardo]] first formulated this law as a law of [[Wikipedia:Comparative advantage\|comparative cost]] within the context of the theory of foreign trade. Later economists such as Pareto, Edgeworth, Seligman, and Mises argued that it was in fact a general law of exchange. Mises coined the expression “law of association.” Even if there were no other reasons for human beings to cooperate, the greater productivity of joint efforts, compared to isolated production, tends to draw them together.<ref name="Hulsmann_production">Jörg Guido Hülsmann. [http://www.mises.org/books/moneyproduction.pdf "The Ethics of Money Production"], 1. The Division of Labor without Money, p.21, referenced 2009-05-08</ref>
	{{See also\|Production}}		{{See also\|Production}}

Line 12:		Line 12:
	For example, Amy can produce either one hundred oranges or ten tires in a day while Chen can produce ten oranges or two tires in a day. It doesn't look like they have anything to gain by trading: Amy is much more productive than Chen.		For example, Amy can produce either one hundred oranges or ten tires in a day while Chen can produce ten oranges or two tires in a day. It doesn't look like they have anything to gain by trading: Amy is much more productive than Chen.

	But compare their '''opportunity costs''' - what you have to give up to get something else. To produce one hundred oranges, Amy gives up the opportunity to produce ten tires. Her opportunity cost of an orange is one tenth of a tire, and her opportunity cost of a tire is ten oranges. Chen's opportunity cost of an orange is one fifth of a tire, and her opportunity cost of a tire is five oranges.		But compare their '''opportunity costs''' - what you have to give up to get something else. To produce one hundred oranges, Amy gives up the opportunity to produce ten tires. Her opportunity [[cost]] of an orange is one tenth of a tire, and her opportunity cost of a tire is ten oranges. Chen's opportunity cost of an orange is one fifth of a tire, and her opportunity cost of a tire is five oranges.

	In terms of tires, it is cheaper for Amy to produce oranges because she only gives up one tenth of a tire to produce an orange while Chen has to give up one fifth of a tire. In terms of oranges, it is cheaper for Chen to produce tires because he only gives up five oranges to produce a tire while Amy gives up ten oranges to produce a tire.		In terms of tires, it is cheaper for Amy to produce oranges because she only gives up one tenth of a tire to produce an orange while Chen has to give up one fifth of a tire. In terms of oranges, it is cheaper for Chen to produce tires because he only gives up five oranges to produce a tire while Amy gives up ten oranges to produce a tire.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 16 August 2026
Line 18:		Line 18:
	They can both have more oranges and more tires if they specialize and trade. Chen can offer Amy one tire in exchange for seven oranges. Chen would be better off because he would get seven oranges in exchange for one tire, while he would only get five oranges for one tire if he produced them himself. But this is attractive for Amy too, because she can get a tire for only seven oranges, which is fewer than the ten oranges she would have to give up if she produced tires herself. At any "orange price" of tires between five and ten, Amy and Chen are both better off.		They can both have more oranges and more tires if they specialize and trade. Chen can offer Amy one tire in exchange for seven oranges. Chen would be better off because he would get seven oranges in exchange for one tire, while he would only get five oranges for one tire if he produced them himself. But this is attractive for Amy too, because she can get a tire for only seven oranges, which is fewer than the ten oranges she would have to give up if she produced tires herself. At any "orange price" of tires between five and ten, Amy and Chen are both better off.

	The same logic is valid for countries - countries are also better off if they can specialize and trade.<ref name="Caden_Opportunity">Art Caden. [~~http~~://mises.org/story/3744 "Tire Trade Tirade"], Mises Daily, posted on Monday, October 12, 2009. Referenced 2009-10-13.</ref>		The same logic is valid for countries - countries are also better off if they can specialize and trade.<ref name="Caden_Opportunity">Art Caden. [https://mises.freecapitalists.org/story/3744 "Tire Trade Tirade"], Mises Daily, posted on Monday, October 12, 2009. Referenced 2009-10-13.</ref>

	==Direct Exchange==		==Direct Exchange==
Line 36:		Line 36:
	In a voluntary exchange is the [[Value\|valuation]] of goods different and reverse: each party values what is given up less than what is received in the exchange. Because individuals value [[good]]s differently, there are mutual "gains from trade". Both parties benefit from a voluntary exchange (or at least expect to).<ref name="Rothbard_value">Murray N. Rothbard. [http://mises.org/rothbard/mes/chap2a.asp "2. Types of Interpersonal Action: Voluntary Exchange and the Contractual Society"], Chapter 2-Direct Exchange, ''[[Man, Economy and State]]'', online version, referenced 2009-05-26.</ref>		In a voluntary exchange is the [[Value\|valuation]] of goods different and reverse: each party values what is given up less than what is received in the exchange. Because individuals value [[good]]s differently, there are mutual "gains from trade". Both parties benefit from a voluntary exchange (or at least expect to).<ref name="Rothbard_value">Murray N. Rothbard. [http://mises.org/rothbard/mes/chap2a.asp "2. Types of Interpersonal Action: Voluntary Exchange and the Contractual Society"], Chapter 2-Direct Exchange, ''[[Man, Economy and State]]'', online version, referenced 2009-05-26.</ref>

	Most philosophers in the history of the world, including [[Wikipedia:Aristotle\|Aristotle]], have missed this point. They believed that exchange takes place when valuation is equal or in proportian. But that is just wrong: if two people value goods equally, an exchange would never take place, since no individual could be made better off than before. People would be wasting time engaging in it at all. The discovery of the correct theory of exchange had to wait until the late Middle Ages when the followers of [[Wikipedia:Thomas Aquinas\|St. Thomas Aquinas]] saw the logic for the first time. They saw that economic exchange was mutually beneficial, with each party to the exchange seeing an increase in personal welfare, subjectively perceived. The action of exchange on its own becomes a means of increasing the well-being of all people. Even if there is no new physical property available, no new innovations, no new productivity, wealth can be increased by the mere fact of exchange-based human associations.<ref name="Tucker_benefactor">Jeffrey A. Tucker. [~~http~~://mises.org/daily/4427 "A Society of Mutual Benefactors"], Mises Daily, May 2010, referenced 2010-05-25.</ref>		Most philosophers in the history of the world, including [[Wikipedia:Aristotle\|Aristotle]], have missed this point. They believed that exchange takes place when valuation is equal or in proportian. But that is just wrong: if two people value goods equally, an exchange would never take place, since no individual could be made better off than before. People would be wasting time engaging in it at all. The discovery of the correct theory of exchange had to wait until the late Middle Ages when the followers of [[Wikipedia:Thomas Aquinas\|St. Thomas Aquinas]] saw the logic for the first time. They saw that economic exchange was mutually beneficial, with each party to the exchange seeing an increase in personal welfare, subjectively perceived. The action of exchange on its own becomes a means of increasing the well-being of all people. Even if there is no new physical property available, no new innovations, no new productivity, wealth can be increased by the mere fact of exchange-based human associations.<ref name="Tucker_benefactor">Jeffrey A. Tucker. [https://mises.freecapitalists.org/daily/4427 "A Society of Mutual Benefactors"], Mises Daily, May 2010, referenced 2010-05-25.</ref>

	Trade also fosters specialization and the ''division of labor''. By specializing in activities in which they are relatively most productive (or have the comparative advantage), actors greatly increase the productivity of their labor and enjoy more consumption goods than would be possible without trade.<ref name="Rothbard_division">Murray N. Rothbard. [http://mises.org/rothbard/mes/chap2a.asp#3._Exchange_andthe_Division "3. Exchange and the Division of Labor"], Chapter 2-Direct Exchange, ''[[Man, Economy and State]]'', online version, referenced 2009-05-26.</ref>		Trade also fosters specialization and the ''division of labor''. By specializing in activities in which they are relatively most productive (or have the comparative advantage), actors greatly increase the productivity of their labor and enjoy more consumption goods than would be possible without trade.<ref name="Rothbard_division">Murray N. Rothbard. [http://mises.org/rothbard/mes/chap2a.asp#3._Exchange_andthe_Division "3. Exchange and the Division of Labor"], Chapter 2-Direct Exchange, ''[[Man, Economy and State]]'', online version, referenced 2009-05-26.</ref>
Line 50:		Line 50:
	==Links==		==Links==
	* [[Wikipedia:Trade\|Trade]] on Wikipedia		* [[Wikipedia:Trade\|Trade]] on Wikipedia
	* Jeffrey Tucker, [~~http~~://mises.org/story/3834 Halloween and its Candy Economy], article on exchange and formation of money		* Jeffrey Tucker, [https://mises.freecapitalists.org/story/3834 Halloween and its Candy Economy], article on exchange and formation of money
	* [http://blog.mises.org/archives/011356.asp The Story of Trade and Money] by Walter Block (video mashup of a lecture)		* [http://blog.mises.org/archives/011356.asp The Story of Trade and Money] by Walter Block (video mashup of a lecture)
	* [~~http~~://mises.org/daily/3134 Trade Makes People Better Off, Even Superheroes] by Art Carden and Mike Hammock, October 2008		* [https://mises.freecapitalists.org/daily/3134 Trade Makes People Better Off, Even Superheroes] by Art Carden and Mike Hammock, October 2008
	* [~~http~~://mises.org/daily/1469 Ten Ethical Objections to the Market Economy] by Murray N. Rothbard, excerpted from [[Man, Economy, and State]]		* [https://mises.freecapitalists.org/daily/1469 Ten Ethical Objections to the Market Economy] by Murray N. Rothbard, excerpted from [[Man, Economy, and State]]
	* [~~http~~://mises.org/daily/4635 The Law of Association] by Abhinandan Mallick, September 2010		* [https://mises.freecapitalists.org/daily/4635 The Law of Association] by Abhinandan Mallick, September 2010
	[[Category:Economic concepts]]		[[Category:Economic concepts]]