Pollution - Revision history

77.70.95.50 at 09:48, 20 December 2013

2013-12-20T09:48:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:48, 20 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Pollution''', that is, the contamination of air, water and soil with harmful substances, is often used as an example of a [[tragedy of the commons]].		'''Pollution''', that is, the contamination of air, water and soil with harmful substances, is often used as an example of a [[tragedy of the commons]] and aggression against other people's property..

	==Links==		==Links==

Pesterbot: /* Links */External Links to Links, replaced: ==External links== → ==Links==

2011-06-21T19:11:05Z

Links: External Links to Links, replaced: ==External links== → ==Links==

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 21 June 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Pollution''', that is, the contamination of air, water and soil with harmful substances, is often used as an example of a [[tragedy of the commons]].		'''Pollution''', that is, the contamination of air, water and soil with harmful substances, is often used as an example of a [[tragedy of the commons]].

	==~~External links~~==		==Links==
	*[http://mises.org/daily/2120 Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution]		*[http://mises.org/daily/2120 Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution]
	*[http://mises.org/daily/4464 Pollution and Government Failure in China] by Eric M. Staib, June 2010		*[http://mises.org/daily/4464 Pollution and Government Failure in China] by Eric M. Staib, June 2010

Wesleybruce: Soil pollution is a problem particularly where the land use changes: I.E. The Love canal case.

2010-11-17T04:28:45Z

Soil pollution is a problem particularly where the land use changes: I.E. The Love canal case.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:28, 17 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Pollution''', that is, the contamination of air or water with harmful substances, is often used as an example of a [[tragedy of the commons]].		'''Pollution''', that is, the contamination of air, water and soil with harmful substances, is often used as an example of a [[tragedy of the commons]].

	==External links==		==External links==

Pestergaines: /* External links */ Resources added.

2010-11-16T22:46:25Z

External links: Resources added.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 16 November 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==External links==		==External links==
	*[http://mises.org/daily/2120 Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution]		*[http://mises.org/daily/2120 Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution]
			*[http://mises.org/daily/4464 Pollution and Government Failure in China] by Eric M. Staib, June 2010
			*[http://mises.org/daily/4288 The Cairo Garbage Calamity] by Anders Mikkelsen, May 2010

	{{stub}}		{{stub}}

	[[Category:Economic concepts]]		[[Category:Economic concepts]]

Forgottenman: format, add line of basic text

2010-11-16T17:30:59Z

format, add line of basic text

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 16 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~There needs to be a page~~ that ~~discusses this. For many~~, the ~~reality~~ of ~~unpaid for costs imposed externally~~ is ~~the reason to embrace government involvement. Despite much asserting under Austrian system about ability to sue etc., I have yet to see~~ a ~~clear exposition~~ of ~~how this works practically. I am convinced about libertarian thinking, but do not have the firepower to make~~ the ~~argument with folks. A good page here would go a long way I reckon~~.		'''Pollution''', that is, the contamination of air or water with harmful substances, is often used as an example of a [[tragedy of the commons]].

			==External links==
			*[http://mises.org/daily/2120 Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution]

	~~===external links===~~		{{stub}}
	*[~~http~~:~~//mises.org/daily/2120 Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution~~]
			[[Category:Economic concepts]]

128.135.235.248 at 17:20, 16 November 2010

2010-11-16T17:20:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 16 November 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:


	~~---~~external links~~---~~		===external links===
	*[http://mises.org/daily/2120 Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution]		*[http://mises.org/daily/2120 Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution]

128.135.235.248 at 17:20, 16 November 2010

2010-11-16T17:20:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 16 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	There needs to be a page that discusses this. For many, the reality of unpaid for costs imposed externally is the reason to embrace government involvement. Despite much asserting under Austrian system about ability to sue etc., I have yet to see a clear exposition of how this works practically. I am convinced about libertarian thinking, but do not have the firepower to make the argument with folks. A good page here would go a long way I reckon.		There needs to be a page that discusses this. For many, the reality of unpaid for costs imposed externally is the reason to embrace government involvement. Despite much asserting under Austrian system about ability to sue etc., I have yet to see a clear exposition of how this works practically. I am convinced about libertarian thinking, but do not have the firepower to make the argument with folks. A good page here would go a long way I reckon.


			---external links---
			*[http://mises.org/daily/2120 Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution]

60.242.121.41: Created page with "There needs to be a page that discusses this. For many, the reality of unpaid for costs imposed externally is the reason to embrace government involvement. Despite much asserting..."

2010-11-16T03:31:14Z

Created page with "There needs to be a page that discusses this. For many, the reality of unpaid for costs imposed externally is the reason to embrace government involvement. Despite much asserting..."

New page

There needs to be a page that discusses this. For many, the reality of unpaid for costs imposed externally is the reason to embrace government involvement. Despite much asserting under Austrian system about ability to sue etc., I have yet to see a clear exposition of how this works practically. I am convinced about libertarian thinking, but do not have the firepower to make the argument with folks. A good page here would go a long way I reckon.