Government - Revision history

ArchiveBot: Repoint 1 dead mises.org link to the archived original (automated; see Austrian Economics Wiki:Link repointing)

2026-08-16T04:08:44Z

Repoint 1 dead mises.org link to the archived original (automated; see Austrian Economics Wiki:Link repointing)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:08, 16 August 2026
Line 25:		Line 25:

	==Links==		==Links==
	* [~~http~~://mises.org/daily/5485/Contra-Conventional-Measures-of-the-Growth-of-Government Contra Conventional Measures of the Growth of Government] by Robert Higgs, July 2011		* [https://mises.freecapitalists.org/daily/5485/Contra-Conventional-Measures-of-the-Growth-of-Government Contra Conventional Measures of the Growth of Government] by Robert Higgs, July 2011

	{{stub}}		{{stub}}

John James: precise definition

2013-04-14T02:54:28Z

precise definition

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:54, 14 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Wikipedia text\|\|417344622}}		{{Wikipedia text\|\|417344622}}

	In the [[social sciences]], the term '''government''' refers to the particular group of people, the administrative [[bureaucracy]], who control a [[Nation-state\|(nation-)]][[state (polity)\|state]] at a given time, and the manner in which ~~their~~ governing organizations are structured.<ref>{{Cite book\|chapter=government\|title=Oxford English Dictionary\|edition=Online\|publisher=Oxford University Press\|date=November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite book\|editor=Bealey, Frank\|chapter=government\|title=The Blackwell dictionary of political science: a user's guide to its terms\|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell\|year=1999\|isbn=9780631206958\|page=147\|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=6EuKLlzYoTMC&pg=PA147}}</ref> That is, governments are the means through which state power is employed. States are served by a continuous succession of different governments.<ref>{{cite book\|authors=Flint, Colin & Taylor, Peter\|title=Political Geography: World Economy, Nation-State, and Locality\|edition=5th\|publisher=Pearson/Prentice Hall\|year=2007\|isbn=978-0-13-196012-1\|page=137\|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=GXz9xHdHeZcC}}</ref>		In the [[social sciences]], the term '''government''' refers to the particular group of people, the administrative [[bureaucracy]], who enjoy a quasi-socially granted [[monopoly]] on the initiation of [[force]]. This monopoly is expressed as control of a [[Nation-state\|(nation-)]][[state (polity)\|state]] at a given time, and the manner in which the group's governing organizations are structured.<ref>{{Cite book\|chapter=government\|title=Oxford English Dictionary\|edition=Online\|publisher=Oxford University Press\|date=November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite book\|editor=Bealey, Frank\|chapter=government\|title=The Blackwell dictionary of political science: a user's guide to its terms\|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell\|year=1999\|isbn=9780631206958\|page=147\|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=6EuKLlzYoTMC&pg=PA147}}</ref> That is, governments are the means through which state power is employed. States are served by a continuous succession of different governments.<ref>{{cite book\|authors=Flint, Colin & Taylor, Peter\|title=Political Geography: World Economy, Nation-State, and Locality\|edition=5th\|publisher=Pearson/Prentice Hall\|year=2007\|isbn=978-0-13-196012-1\|page=137\|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=GXz9xHdHeZcC}}</ref>

	Each successive government is composed of a specialized and privileged body of individuals, who monopolize political decision-making, and are separated by status and organization from the population as a whole. Their function is to enforce existing [[laws]], legislate new ones, and arbitrate conflicts via their monopoly on [[violence]]. In some societies, this group is often a self-perpetuating or hereditary class. In other societies, such as [[democracies]], the political roles remain, but there is frequent turnover of the people actually filling the positions.<ref>{{cite book\|author=Barclay, Harold\|title=People Without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy\|publisher=Left Bank Books\|year=1990\|isbn=1871082161\|page=31}}</ref>		Each successive government is composed of a specialized and privileged body of individuals, who monopolize political decision-making, and are separated by status and organization from the population as a whole. Their function is to enforce existing [[laws]], legislate new ones, and arbitrate conflicts via their monopoly on [[violence]]. In some societies, this group is often a self-perpetuating or hereditary class. In other societies, such as [[democracies]], the political roles remain, but there is frequent turnover of the people actually filling the positions.<ref>{{cite book\|author=Barclay, Harold\|title=People Without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy\|publisher=Left Bank Books\|year=1990\|isbn=1871082161\|page=31}}</ref>

Pestergaines: +link

2012-08-06T13:36:04Z

+link

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 6 August 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	In the [[social sciences]], the term '''government''' refers to the particular group of people, the administrative [[bureaucracy]], who control a [[Nation-state\|(nation-)]][[state (polity)\|state]] at a given time, and the manner in which their governing organizations are structured.<ref>{{Cite book\|chapter=government\|title=Oxford English Dictionary\|edition=Online\|publisher=Oxford University Press\|date=November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite book\|editor=Bealey, Frank\|chapter=government\|title=The Blackwell dictionary of political science: a user's guide to its terms\|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell\|year=1999\|isbn=9780631206958\|page=147\|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=6EuKLlzYoTMC&pg=PA147}}</ref> That is, governments are the means through which state power is employed. States are served by a continuous succession of different governments.<ref>{{cite book\|authors=Flint, Colin & Taylor, Peter\|title=Political Geography: World Economy, Nation-State, and Locality\|edition=5th\|publisher=Pearson/Prentice Hall\|year=2007\|isbn=978-0-13-196012-1\|page=137\|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=GXz9xHdHeZcC}}</ref>		In the [[social sciences]], the term '''government''' refers to the particular group of people, the administrative [[bureaucracy]], who control a [[Nation-state\|(nation-)]][[state (polity)\|state]] at a given time, and the manner in which their governing organizations are structured.<ref>{{Cite book\|chapter=government\|title=Oxford English Dictionary\|edition=Online\|publisher=Oxford University Press\|date=November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite book\|editor=Bealey, Frank\|chapter=government\|title=The Blackwell dictionary of political science: a user's guide to its terms\|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell\|year=1999\|isbn=9780631206958\|page=147\|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=6EuKLlzYoTMC&pg=PA147}}</ref> That is, governments are the means through which state power is employed. States are served by a continuous succession of different governments.<ref>{{cite book\|authors=Flint, Colin & Taylor, Peter\|title=Political Geography: World Economy, Nation-State, and Locality\|edition=5th\|publisher=Pearson/Prentice Hall\|year=2007\|isbn=978-0-13-196012-1\|page=137\|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=GXz9xHdHeZcC}}</ref>

	Each successive government is composed of a specialized and privileged body of individuals, who monopolize political decision-making, and are separated by status and organization from the population as a whole. Their function is to enforce existing [[laws]], legislate new ones, and arbitrate conflicts via their monopoly on violence. In some societies, this group is often a self-perpetuating or hereditary class. In other societies, such as [[democracies]], the political roles remain, but there is frequent turnover of the people actually filling the positions.<ref>{{cite book\|author=Barclay, Harold\|title=People Without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy\|publisher=Left Bank Books\|year=1990\|isbn=1871082161\|page=31}}</ref>		Each successive government is composed of a specialized and privileged body of individuals, who monopolize political decision-making, and are separated by status and organization from the population as a whole. Their function is to enforce existing [[laws]], legislate new ones, and arbitrate conflicts via their monopoly on [[violence]]. In some societies, this group is often a self-perpetuating or hereditary class. In other societies, such as [[democracies]], the political roles remain, but there is frequent turnover of the people actually filling the positions.<ref>{{cite book\|author=Barclay, Harold\|title=People Without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy\|publisher=Left Bank Books\|year=1990\|isbn=1871082161\|page=31}}</ref>

	In most Western societies, there is a clear distinction between a government and the state. Public disapproval of a particular government (expressed, for example, by not re-electing an incumbent) does not necessarily represent disapproval of the state itself (i.e. of the particular framework of government). However, in some [[totalitarian]] regimes, there is not a clear distinction between the regime and the state. In fact, leaders in such regimes often attempt to deliberately blur the lines between the two, in order to conflate their own selfish interests with those of the polity.<ref>{{cite book\|author=Holsti, Kalevi Jaako\|title=The state, war, and the state of war\|publisher=Cambridge University Press\|year=1996\|isbn=9780521577908\|pages=84–85\|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=5S_jQSUghsYC&pg=PA84}}</ref>		In most Western societies, there is a clear distinction between a government and the state. Public disapproval of a particular government (expressed, for example, by not re-electing an incumbent) does not necessarily represent disapproval of the state itself (i.e. of the particular framework of government). However, in some [[totalitarian]] regimes, there is not a clear distinction between the regime and the state. In fact, leaders in such regimes often attempt to deliberately blur the lines between the two, in order to conflate their own selfish interests with those of the polity.<ref>{{cite book\|author=Holsti, Kalevi Jaako\|title=The state, war, and the state of war\|publisher=Cambridge University Press\|year=1996\|isbn=9780521577908\|pages=84–85\|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=5S_jQSUghsYC&pg=PA84}}</ref>

Pestergaines: +res

2011-07-26T21:43:43Z

+res

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:43, 26 July 2011
Line 23:		Line 23:
	==References==		==References==
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}

			==Links==
			* [http://mises.org/daily/5485/Contra-Conventional-Measures-of-the-Growth-of-Government Contra Conventional Measures of the Growth of Government] by Robert Higgs, July 2011

	{{stub}}		{{stub}}

174.21.119.12 at 09:44, 19 June 2011

2011-06-19T09:44:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:44, 19 June 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:

	The 14th century [[Arab]] scholar [[Ibn Khaldun]] defined the government as "an institution which prevents injustice other than such as it commits itself". The British philosopher-anthropologist [[Ernest Gellner]] considered Ibn Khaldun's definition to be the best in the history of [[political theory]]. For Ibn Khaldun, government should be restrained to a minimum for as a necessary evil, it is the constraint of men by other men.<ref>{{cite book \|last=Gellner \|first=Ernest \|authorlink=Ernest Gellner \|title=Plough, Sword, and Book \|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=CwZFV7J7Id8C&pg=PA239&dq=Gellner+Plough+Sword+and+Book+Ibn+Khaldun%27s+definition#v=onepage&q=&f=false \|page=239 \|year=1992 \|publisher=University of Chicago Press \|isbn=0226287027 \|quote=(Ibn Khaldun's definition of government probably remains the best:...)}}</ref>		The 14th century [[Arab]] scholar [[Ibn Khaldun]] defined the government as "an institution which prevents injustice other than such as it commits itself". The British philosopher-anthropologist [[Ernest Gellner]] considered Ibn Khaldun's definition to be the best in the history of [[political theory]]. For Ibn Khaldun, government should be restrained to a minimum for as a necessary evil, it is the constraint of men by other men.<ref>{{cite book \|last=Gellner \|first=Ernest \|authorlink=Ernest Gellner \|title=Plough, Sword, and Book \|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=CwZFV7J7Id8C&pg=PA239&dq=Gellner+Plough+Sword+and+Book+Ibn+Khaldun%27s+definition#v=onepage&q=&f=false \|page=239 \|year=1992 \|publisher=University of Chicago Press \|isbn=0226287027 \|quote=(Ibn Khaldun's definition of government probably remains the best:...)}}</ref>

			Elements of Government
			The role of government is decided by the party with the necessary influence to establish it. In general, however, we have must have rules and the means to enforce them.

			Rules are generally created through some process or interpretted by some process from a special source. Joseph Smith, the prophet, for example interpretted divine law with the Seer Stone and a hat.<ref>{{cite book\|author=Nelson, Russell M., Elder\|title=A Treasured Testament. Ensign, July 1993\|publisher=LDS\|year=1993\|isbn=\|pages=61\|http://lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD&locale=0&sourceId=05169209df38b010VgnVCM1000004d82620a____&hideNav}}</ref>
			More mundanely, Americans elected politicians in nifty wigs to do the job.

			To the extent that resources are taken from the industrious for public use, the rules must encompass the distribution of that resource pool.

			Enforcement can take any number of forms, but the strategic use of force is generally effective. Agents of the state are typically granted special powers to accomplish the goals of the those who influence the rules and enforcement. These special powers are legal in nature, rather than super powers. The authorities possess no super powers, other than x-ray vision at airports.

			Additionally, enforcement typically involves some system of judgment. These are also quite diverse. In some times and places, the community would act as an impromptu judiciary. Using their understanding of fluid dynamics and the buoyancy of witches, they relied on lake water to judge the accused. Juries, committees and dictators' whims are also quite popular ways of dispensing justice.

	==References==		==References==

Shard: Created Government page and imported content from wikipedia

2011-03-07T13:07:07Z

Created Government page and imported content from wikipedia

New page

{{Wikipedia text||417344622}}

In the [[social sciences]], the term '''government''' refers to the particular group of people, the administrative [[bureaucracy]], who control a [[Nation-state|(nation-)]][[state (polity)|state]] at a given time, and the manner in which their governing organizations are structured.<ref>{{Cite book|chapter=government|title=Oxford English Dictionary|edition=Online|publisher=Oxford University Press|date=November 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|editor=Bealey, Frank|chapter=government|title=The Blackwell dictionary of political science: a user's guide to its terms|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|year=1999|isbn=9780631206958|page=147|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=6EuKLlzYoTMC&pg=PA147}}</ref> That is, governments are the means through which state power is employed. States are served by a continuous succession of different governments.<ref>{{cite book|authors=Flint, Colin & Taylor, Peter|title=Political Geography: World Economy, Nation-State, and Locality|edition=5th|publisher=Pearson/Prentice Hall|year=2007|isbn=978-0-13-196012-1|page=137|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=GXz9xHdHeZcC}}</ref>

Each successive government is composed of a specialized and privileged body of individuals, who monopolize political decision-making, and are separated by status and organization from the population as a whole. Their function is to enforce existing [[laws]], legislate new ones, and arbitrate conflicts via their monopoly on violence. In some societies, this group is often a self-perpetuating or hereditary class. In other societies, such as [[democracies]], the political roles remain, but there is frequent turnover of the people actually filling the positions.<ref>{{cite book|author=Barclay, Harold|title=People Without Government: An Anthropology of Anarchy|publisher=Left Bank Books|year=1990|isbn=1871082161|page=31}}</ref>

In most Western societies, there is a clear distinction between a government and the state. Public disapproval of a particular government (expressed, for example, by not re-electing an incumbent) does not necessarily represent disapproval of the state itself (i.e. of the particular framework of government). However, in some [[totalitarian]] regimes, there is not a clear distinction between the regime and the state. In fact, leaders in such regimes often attempt to deliberately blur the lines between the two, in order to conflate their own selfish interests with those of the polity.<ref>{{cite book|author=Holsti, Kalevi Jaako|title=The state, war, and the state of war|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1996|isbn=9780521577908|pages=84–85|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=5S_jQSUghsYC&pg=PA84}}</ref>

The 14th century [[Arab]] scholar [[Ibn Khaldun]] defined the government as "an institution which prevents injustice other than such as it commits itself". The British philosopher-anthropologist [[Ernest Gellner]] considered Ibn Khaldun's definition to be the best in the history of [[political theory]]. For Ibn Khaldun, government should be restrained to a minimum for as a necessary evil, it is the constraint of men by other men.<ref>{{cite book |last=Gellner |first=Ernest |authorlink=Ernest Gellner |title=Plough, Sword, and Book |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=CwZFV7J7Id8C&pg=PA239&dq=Gellner+Plough+Sword+and+Book+Ibn+Khaldun%27s+definition#v=onepage&q=&f=false |page=239 |year=1992 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=0226287027 |quote=(Ibn Khaldun's definition of government probably remains the best:...)}}</ref>

==References==
{{Reflist}}

{{stub}}