Conservapedia - Revision history

Pestergaines: Removed editorializing.

2012-11-14T15:49:35Z

Removed editorializing.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 14 November 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Conservapedia''' is a [[wiki]] written from a [[conservative]] [[Christian]] point of view. An "assume good faith" policy is not practiced there; rather, editors easily come under a cloud of suspicion as being possible infiltrators and undercover satirists, and it is quite easy to be banned based on such suspicions alone. Participation in [[RationalWiki]] can also be deemed sufficient cause for banning, as Conservapedians regard RW as a "vandal site." Many Conservapedia editors have fled to [[Ameriwiki]], which has ~~a considerably more laid-back culture.~~ Conservapedia ~~has been cited as one of five (if not~~ one of ~~the top~~ five) terrifying bastardizations of the [[Wikipedia]] model.<ref>{{cite web\|url=http://www.cracked.com/article_17341_5-terrifying-bastardizations-wikipedia-model.html\|title=5 Terrifying Bastardizations of the Wikipedia Model\|author=Wong, David\|date=11 May 2009\|publisher=Cracked}}</ref>		'''Conservapedia''' is a [[wiki]] written from a [[conservative]] [[Christian]] point of view. David Wong has listed Conservapedia in one of five terrifying bastardizations of the [[Wikipedia]] model.<ref>{{cite web\|url=http://www.cracked.com/article_17341_5-terrifying-bastardizations-wikipedia-model.html\|title=5 Terrifying Bastardizations of the Wikipedia Model\|author=Wong, David\|date=11 May 2009\|publisher=Cracked}}</ref>

	==References==		==References==

FormerContributor-78162cb3 at 05:45, 17 October 2012

2012-10-17T05:45:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 17 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Conservapedia''' is a [[wiki]] written from a [[conservative]] [[Christian]] point of view. An "assume good faith" policy is not practiced there; rather, editors easily come under a cloud of suspicion as being possible infiltrators and undercover satirists, and it is quite easy to be banned based on such suspicions alone. Participation in [[RationalWiki]] can also be deemed sufficient cause for banning, as Conservapedians regard RW as a "vandal site." Many Conservapedia editors have fled to [[Ameriwiki]], which has a considerably more laid-back culture.		'''Conservapedia''' is a [[wiki]] written from a [[conservative]] [[Christian]] point of view. An "assume good faith" policy is not practiced there; rather, editors easily come under a cloud of suspicion as being possible infiltrators and undercover satirists, and it is quite easy to be banned based on such suspicions alone. Participation in [[RationalWiki]] can also be deemed sufficient cause for banning, as Conservapedians regard RW as a "vandal site." Many Conservapedia editors have fled to [[Ameriwiki]], which has a considerably more laid-back culture. Conservapedia has been cited as one of five (if not one of the top five) terrifying bastardizations of the [[Wikipedia]] model.<ref>{{cite web\|url=http://www.cracked.com/article_17341_5-terrifying-bastardizations-wikipedia-model.html\|title=5 Terrifying Bastardizations of the Wikipedia Model\|author=Wong, David\|date=11 May 2009\|publisher=Cracked}}</ref>

			==References==
			{{reflist}}

	==External link==		==External link==

FormerContributor-78162cb3: Created page with "'''Conservapedia''' is a wiki written from a conservative Christian point of view. An "assume good faith" policy is not practiced there; rather, editors easily com..."

2012-10-11T20:38:39Z

Created page with "'''Conservapedia''' is a wiki written from a conservative Christian point of view. An "assume good faith" policy is not practiced there; rather, editors easily com..."

New page

'''Conservapedia''' is a [[wiki]] written from a [[conservative]] [[Christian]] point of view. An "assume good faith" policy is not practiced there; rather, editors easily come under a cloud of suspicion as being possible infiltrators and undercover satirists, and it is quite easy to be banned based on such suspicions alone. Participation in [[RationalWiki]] can also be deemed sufficient cause for banning, as Conservapedians regard RW as a "vandal site." Many Conservapedia editors have fled to [[Ameriwiki]], which has a considerably more laid-back culture.

==External link==
*http://conservapedia.com/

[[Category:Wikis]]