Pestergaines: Polishing.

2013-01-01T13:57:35Z

Polishing.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 1 January 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Compromise''' is a meeting in the middle between two stances. [[Ludwig von Mises]] opposed compromise when it resulted in a logically nonsensical result.<ref>{{cite book\|quote=Some authors try to justify the contradictions of generally accepted ideologies by pointing out the alleged advantages of a compromise, however unsatisfactory from the logical point of view, for the smooth functioning of interhuman relations.\|chapter=The Fight Against Error\|author=Mises, Ludwig von}}</ref> However, he also wrote, "No party would wittingly prefer social disintegration, anarchy, and a return to primitive barbarism to a solution which must be bought at the price of the sacrifice of some ideological points."<ref>{{cite book\|chapter=World View and Ideology\|author=Mises, Ludwig von\|title=Human Action}}</ref> He also attacked [[interventionism]] by arguing that "the reasoning of the advocates of this middle solution is entirely fallacious. The conflict between socialism and capitalism is not a struggle between two parties for a greater share in the social dividend. To see the matter this way is tantamount to a full acceptance of the tenets of the Marxians and the other socialists."<ref>{{cite book\|author=Mises, Ludwig von\|chapter=The Plain Citizen versus the Professional Propagandist of Bureaucratization\|title=Human Action\|url=http://mises.org/etexts/mises/bureaucracy/section7.asp}}</ref>		'''Compromise''' is a meeting in the middle between two stances.{{Fact}}

			==Views==
			[[Ludwig von Mises]] opposed compromise when it resulted in a logically nonsensical result.<ref>{{cite book\|quote=Some authors try to justify the contradictions of generally accepted ideologies by pointing out the alleged advantages of a compromise, however unsatisfactory from the logical point of view, for the smooth functioning of interhuman relations.\|chapter=The Fight Against Error\|author=Mises, Ludwig von}}</ref> However, he also wrote, "No party would wittingly prefer social disintegration, anarchy, and a return to primitive barbarism to a solution which must be bought at the price of the sacrifice of some ideological points."<ref>{{cite book\|chapter=World View and Ideology\|author=Mises, Ludwig von\|title=Human Action}}</ref> He also attacked [[interventionism]] by arguing that "the reasoning of the advocates of this middle solution is entirely fallacious. The conflict between socialism and capitalism is not a struggle between two parties for a greater share in the social dividend. To see the matter this way is tantamount to a full acceptance of the tenets of the Marxians and the other socialists."<ref>{{cite book\|author=Mises, Ludwig von\|chapter=The Plain Citizen versus the Professional Propagandist of Bureaucratization\|title=Human Action\|url=http://mises.org/etexts/mises/bureaucracy/section7.asp}}</ref>

	==References==		==References==
	{{reflist}}		{{reflist}}

			==Links==
			* {{wplink}}

	[[Category:Concepts]]		[[Category:Concepts]]

FormerContributor-78162cb3: Created page with "'''Compromise''' is a meeting in the middle between two stances. Ludwig von Mises opposed compromise when it resulted in a logically nonsensical result.{{cite book|qu..."

2012-10-27T02:04:40Z

Created page with "'''Compromise''' is a meeting in the middle between two stances. Ludwig von Mises opposed compromise when it resulted in a logically nonsensical result.<ref>{{cite book|qu..."

New page

'''Compromise''' is a meeting in the middle between two stances. [[Ludwig von Mises]] opposed compromise when it resulted in a logically nonsensical result.<ref>{{cite book|quote=Some authors try to justify the contradictions of generally accepted ideologies by pointing out the alleged advantages of a compromise, however unsatisfactory from the logical point of view, for the smooth functioning of interhuman relations.|chapter=The Fight Against Error|author=Mises, Ludwig von}}</ref> However, he also wrote, "No party would wittingly prefer social disintegration, anarchy, and a return to primitive barbarism to a solution which must be bought at the price of the sacrifice of some ideological points."<ref>{{cite book|chapter=World View and Ideology|author=Mises, Ludwig von|title=Human Action}}</ref> He also attacked [[interventionism]] by arguing that "the reasoning of the advocates of this middle solution is entirely fallacious. The conflict between socialism and capitalism is not a struggle between two parties for a greater share in the social dividend. To see the matter this way is tantamount to a full acceptance of the tenets of the Marxians and the other socialists."<ref>{{cite book|author=Mises, Ludwig von|chapter=The Plain Citizen versus the Professional Propagandist of Bureaucratization|title=Human Action|url=http://mises.org/etexts/mises/bureaucracy/section7.asp}}</ref>

==References==
{{reflist}}

[[Category:Concepts]]

Compromise - Revision history

Pestergaines: Polishing.

FormerContributor-78162cb3: Created page with "'''Compromise''' is a meeting in the middle between two stances. Ludwig von Mises opposed compromise when it resulted in a logically nonsensical result.{{cite book|qu..."