View source for User:JustinBaugh

''They taught me that life is constant fear. I taught myself not to carry such burdens.''

People sometimes look to leaders for a definition of their role in the society they live in. While I agree that approval is sometimes necessary for the actions of individuals in a family or small community environment I can find no satisfactory reason that this kind of socialist mindset in a society made up of hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of families and individuals is necessary or wise. Especially when that society depends on the division and specialization of labor that stems from capitalism to provide the goods and services that sustain their lives on a daily basis. An individual seeking approval from those they see as above them is, at best, unhealthy. A paternalistic society is one of children seeking recognition for the deeds they do; chaotic and dependent on the "go-ahead" from some eminent figure or table of men that seem to be running things. Nothing could be further from natural.

==About==

''Relatively'' young reader of [[Ludwig von Mises]] and [[Murray Rothbard]]. 

[[Ron Paul]] is my main influence in using logic and reason to overcome my public school indoctrination.

==Main Areas of Interest==

*Banking
**Centralized
**Fractional-reserve
**Private
*United States History
*Libertarian Thought
*Socialism
*Law enforcement
*Military

==Personal Library==

'''Ludwig von Mises'''
::''Human Action''
::''The Theory of Money and Credit''
::''Socialism''
::''Theory and History''
::''Omnipotent Government''
::''Bureaucracy''
::''Interventionism''
::''Liberalism''
::''Profit and Loss''

'''Murray Rothbard'''
::''Man, Economy, and State with Power and Market
::''America's Great Depression
::''Conceived in Liberty
::''What Has Government Done to Our Money
::''Anatomy of the State''
::''Making Economic Sense''
::''Strictly Confidential'' Edited by David Gordon
::''The Ethics of Liberty''

'''Ron Paul'''
::''Liberty Defined''
::''The Case for Gold''
::''End the Fed''
::''The Revolution''
::''Pillars of Prosperity''
::''The School Revolution''

'''Robert P. Murphy'''
::''Chaos Theory''

'''Judge Andrew Napolitano'''
::''Lies the Government Told You''

'''H. L. Mencken'''
::''Notes on Democracy''

'''Thomas E. Woods. Jr.'''
::''33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed To Ask''
::''The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History''

'''G. Edward Griffin'''
::''The Creature from Jekyll Island''

'''Carl Menger'''
::''Principles of Economics''

'''Frederic Bastiat'''
::''The Bastiat Collection''

'''Henry Hazlitt'''
::''Economics in One Lesson''
::''The Failure of the "New Economics"''
::''Man vs. The Welfare State''

'''F. A. Hayek'''
::''The Road to Serfdom''
::''The Constitution of Liberty''
::''Hayek on Hayek''
::''The Fortunes of Liberalism''

'''Garet Garrett'''
::''The Driver''

'''Jeffrey Tucker'''
::''Bourbon for Breakfast''
::''It's A Jetsons World''

'''Douglas E. French'''
::''Walk Away''

'''David A. Stockman'''
::''The Great Deformation''

'''Adam Fergusson'''
::''When Money Dies''


----

<blockquote>It has been asserted that the physiological needs of all men are of the same kind and that this equality provides a standard for the measurement of the degree of their objective satisfaction. In expressing such opinions and in recommending the use of such criteria to guide the government's policy, one proposes to deal with men as the breeder deals with his cattle. But the reformers fail to realize that there is no universal principle of alimentation valid for all men. Which one of the various principles one chooses depends entirely on the aims one wants to attain. The cattle breeder does not feed his cows in order to make them happy, but in order to attain the ends which he has assigned to them in his own plans. He may prefer more milk or more meat or something else. What type of man do the man breeders want to rear--athletes or mathematicians? Warriors or factory hands? He who would make man the material of a purposeful system of breeding and feeding would arrogate to himself despotic powers and would use his fellow citizens as means for the attainment of his own ends, which differ from those they themselves are aiming at. -- Ludwig von Mises, Human Action, pp. 243-244. </blockquote>