View source for Talk:Thomas Woods

This piece can be customized or completely rewritten with data from [the old faculty page http://mises.org/fellow.aspx?Id=23] from Mises.org.--[[User:Jatucker|Jatucker]] 09:52, 23 December 2010 (CST)

== Woods' laws ==

Is there some reason this should not be included?  Jeff Tucker removed this entire section without any explanation, and simply called it "minor edits". 

Which also leads to another question...do we have a definition of "minor edits"? I was under the impression that we were using the Wikipedia understanding of [[wikipedia:WP:MINOR|what constitutes a minor edit]], namely, that it is a small, superficial change such as a typographical or punctuation correction that no editor would be expected to regard as disputable. Is this not the case?  If not, what are we considering a "minor edit?" Can the removal of an entire section be considered "minor"? --[[User:John James|John James]] 00:46, 29 July 2011 (MSD)

For the sake of completeness, this wouldn't be a "minor" edit; the section on Woods' laws was removed due to a request of Thomas Woods - see [[User talk:Jatucker#Woods' laws|here]]. [[User:Pestergaines|Pestergaines]] 02:26, 16 August 2011 (MSD)