<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=219.101.41.227</id>
	<title>The Austrian Economics Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=219.101.41.227"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/219.101.41.227"/>
	<updated>2026-08-17T03:05:23Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.9</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/index.php?title=Talk:Customary_law&amp;diff=7232</id>
		<title>Talk:Customary law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/index.php?title=Talk:Customary_law&amp;diff=7232"/>
		<updated>2010-11-15T04:43:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;219.101.41.227: Created page with &amp;quot;Would like to get some Hayek and Hasnas quotes in here to flesh it out. Such as from here http://mises.org/journals/scholar/hasnas.pdf&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Would like to get some Hayek and Hasnas quotes in here to flesh it out. Such as from here http://mises.org/journals/scholar/hasnas.pdf&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>219.101.41.227</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/index.php?title=Talk:Paul_Krugman&amp;diff=7202</id>
		<title>Talk:Paul Krugman</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/index.php?title=Talk:Paul_Krugman&amp;diff=7202"/>
		<updated>2010-11-15T04:31:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;219.101.41.227: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;We can surely do better! Could we aim for a &amp;quot;show, don&#039;t tell&amp;quot; - i.e. show where he is wrong, ideally by linking and/or quoting from articles that criticize him, instead of just blankly stating that he is incompetent? [[User:Pestergaines|Pestergaines]] 17:43, 14 November 2010 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seconded. &amp;quot;...repeatedly display an inability to grasp fundamental economic concepts&amp;quot; sounds editorial, not factual, nor are the opinions even backed up with facts. A reader stumbling upon this article would naturally conclude that the whole wiki is heavily biased and unsupported by evidence. [[Special:Contributions/219.101.41.227|219.101.41.227]] 22:29, 14 November 2010 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>219.101.41.227</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/index.php?title=Talk:Paul_Krugman&amp;diff=7201</id>
		<title>Talk:Paul Krugman</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/index.php?title=Talk:Paul_Krugman&amp;diff=7201"/>
		<updated>2010-11-15T04:29:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;219.101.41.227: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;We can surely do better! Could we aim for a &amp;quot;show, don&#039;t tell&amp;quot; - i.e. show where he is wrong, ideally by linking and/or quoting from articles that criticize him, instead of just blankly stating that he is incompetent? [[User:Pestergaines|Pestergaines]] 17:43, 14 November 2010 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seconded. Article sounds editorial, not factual, nor are the opinions even backed up with facts. A reader stumbling upon this article would naturally conclude that the whole wiki is heavily biased and unsupported by evidence. [[Special:Contributions/219.101.41.227|219.101.41.227]] 22:29, 14 November 2010 (CST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>219.101.41.227</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/index.php?title=Talk:Paul_Krugman&amp;diff=7200</id>
		<title>Talk:Paul Krugman</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/index.php?title=Talk:Paul_Krugman&amp;diff=7200"/>
		<updated>2010-11-15T04:29:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;219.101.41.227: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;We can surely do better! Could we aim for a &amp;quot;show, don&#039;t tell&amp;quot; - i.e. show where he is wrong, ideally by linking and/or quoting from articles that criticize him, instead of just blankly stating that he is incompetent? [[User:Pestergaines|Pestergaines]] 17:43, 14 November 2010 (CST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seconded. Article sounds editorial, not factual, nor are the opinions even backed up with facts. A reader stumbling upon this article would naturally conclude that the whole wiki is heavily biased and unsupported by evidence.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>219.101.41.227</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>