https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=128.210.90.28 2026-08-17T09:10:17Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.43.9 https://wiki.freecapitalists.org/index.php?title=Talk:Argumentation_ethics&diff=21487 2012-10-27T00:10:45Z

<p>128.210.90.28: Created page with &quot;=Debate= I&#039;m too lazy to do this myself, thus this post; but, in the criticism section I think a bit more attention should be paid to the Murphy and Callahan--not just the re...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div>=Debate=<br /> <br /> I'm too lazy to do this myself, thus this post; but, in the criticism section I think a bit more attention should be paid to the Murphy and Callahan--not just the reply--but the back and forth debate.<br /> <br /> Kinsella documents the back-and-forth:<br /> <br /> http://archive.mises.org/9610/revisiting-argumentation-ethics/<br /> <br /> (note that the back-and-forth also includes a reply by a gentleman by the name Eabrasu and another by Frank van Dun that aren't mentioned in that section)<br /> <br /> However, Kinsella's detailing of the debate misses Block's reply:<br /> <br /> http://mises.org/journals/jls/22_1/22_1_31.pdf<br /> <br /> It also misses (I believe) Murphy and Callahan's rewrite of the original article (which, I don't really feel like looking for at the moment).<br /> <br /> Tl;dr, there's a whole debate to be documented here folks.<br /> <br /> [[Special:Contributions/128.210.90.28|128.210.90.28]] 04:10, 27 October 2012 (MSD)</div>

128.210.90.28